Roe v. Wade: A Threat to Senior Citizens?
by
Tony Nassif
Social Security
Presently there is an estimated two working people for every one person on social security.
In the 1950′s there were thirty-five workers for every person on social security.
Since the Roe v. Wade ruling, abortion has denied America the productivity of nearly 20 million tax paying, social security contributing citizens.
Now the Social Security fund is under greater threat with diminishing contributors and increasing number of beneficiaries. How soon will the well run dry? A national catastrophy looms.
The Unborn Now, the Aged and Infirm Next?
Several years ago a politician said that “old people have a duty to die and get out of the way.” People were outraged and he lost the election. People thought it unthinkable to say such an insensitive and callous thing.
However, Roe v. Wade via abortion on demand has devalued human life replacing moral absolutes with secular humanism/atheism. Thus, declaring man as the final authority of life and death. The unthinkable is becoming thinkable.
For example, in China there is the “one child” policy. Guess what happens if a woman is pregnant with the second child.
Secular humanism/atheism has the inherent objective (whether admitted or not) of survival and benefit of the elitist “haves.”
Before the fall of the Soviet Union I went to Russia in winter. The wind chill factor was 80 below zero.
I was shocked to see an elderly woman (about 60-70 years of age) shoveling snow from the city streets into a government dump truck.
In 1973 the nation devalued the life of helpless, unborn children. This devaluation will and is spreading like a cancer threatening the elderly and infirm.
If the American culture continues the way of secular humanism will there be a belief that the elderly and infirm “have a duty to die and get out of the way”? No one will be exempt.
###